As an undergraduate instructor, one of the courses I teach presently, is Psychology of Racism & Prejudice at the City College of New York, CUNY. My students consistently bring social media into our conversations (e.g., information they obtained) which made me consider how can I begin to include social media into my course work? Thus, I was eager when I was granted the opportunity to participate in the Teach with Social Media workshop and subsequently learn concepts that I can utilize going forward.
I received feedback to separate the initial microaggression assignment into two assignments. Additionally, it was suggested that I shortened the components of the outline (e.g., asking for psychological consequences related to microaggression) and provide an alternative writing assignment to the video presentation. Now, the draft of the outline is a low stakes in – class activity that will be conducted two weeks before the video presentation/paper is due to allow for edits to be made on their outline before incorporating the outline in their presentation/paper and submitting the final version of the outline. The article below will be distributed to students and guide the class discussion.
Complete a one-page draft of the microaggression outline in class. Describe the following:
a) a microaggression that either occur to you or you witness happen, b) the theme of the microaggression (e.g., criminality), c) possible implied messages of the microaggression, and d) how this specific microaggression relate to parts of your own intersectionality/basic social groups and subtypes that you make up.
Additionally, include one source from a peer reviewed journal article that investigates the microaggression you are presenting on.
After you submit the draft, you will receive feedback in one week which will allow for you to make any edits before submitting the final outline.
Part 2 – Final Project
Create a 3-minute TikTok video on a microaggression that you either (1) personally experienced or (2) witnessed happened to one of your peers. The duration of time will allow for you to get your message across in a way that is compelling, but also concise.
Within your video, either (1) describe or (2) act out the microaggression. Include information from the peer reviewed journal article and how it relates to your presentation.
You may also add text, transitions, or effects to your video.
Your microaggression presentation will be allotted five minutes in total during class. Three minutes for the video presentation followed by two minutes for open discussion with the instructor and fellow classmates.
Alternative Assignment: Submit an APA style 3-page paper (not including the References page) on a microaggression they you have either endured or witnessed on a social media platform. Within the paper, you may also address psychological consequences related to this microaggression and how other sources (e.g., the media) further promotes themes associated with the microaggression. Please include a ‘References’ page with at minimum three sources from peer reviewed journal articles.
I received feedback to separate the microaggression assignment into two assignments. Additionally, it was suggested that I shortened the components of the outline (e.g., asking for psychological consequences related to microaggression) and provide an alternative writing assignment. Now, the draft of the outline is a low stakes in class activity that will be conducted two weeks before the video presentation/paper is due to allow for edits to be made on their outline before incorporating the outline in their presentation/paper and submitting the final version of the outline. For the alternative writing assignment, students will be asked to submit a paper on a microaggression they have either endured or witnessed on a social media platform. Before the outline is conducted in class, examples of how microaggressions can be depicted in various settings including online will be discussed. The article below will be distributed to students and guide the class discussion.
Students will be asked to complete a one-page draft of the microaggression outline in class. Students will be asked to describe the microaggression, the theme of the microaggression, possible implied messages of the microaggression, and how this specific microaggression relate to parts of their own intersectionality/basic social groups and subtypes that they make up.
Revision: Use the feedback you received in the previous workshop, revise your social media writing assignment.
Include a brief reflection (150 words) of the changes you made to the assignment and why. This reflection is intended to help you retain meta-knowledge about your assignment designing process.
Designing: Based on recommendations in Chp 2 on sequencing, and Chp 5 on Informal and preparatory writing, design a low stakes in-class writing assignment that will help students prepare for the social media writing assignment you have designed.
*Post both assignments as one post using the “Spring 2023” category on the website.
If you were doing this experiment on participants, what steps must you take for it to be ethical?
If you were conducting this study, would you fully inform your participants? Why or why not?
Assignment
On PsychInfo find and read the article by Seligman, Maier and Geer (1968).
Create an Instagram post that illustares what learned helplessness is.
Create a reel briefly discussing the study and then list and explain what ethical issues should be raised concerning their research.
REVISIONS MADE:
After our last session I received feedback that I should separate it into a class activity and an assignment. I changed the assignment so that now it would incorporate the use of social media. I would require 2 Instagram posts (1 post, 1 reel). Before doing the class assignment we would discuss the Ethics chapter and talk about some examples of unethical research that have been done in the past and how to make them ethical. A week later they would have to create a post and reel discussing the assigned article and the ethical issues in that experiment.
Create a 3-minute TikTok video on a microaggression that you either (1) personally experienced or (2) witnessed happened to one of your peers. The duration of time will allow for you to get your message across in a way that is compelling, but also concise.
Within your video, either (1) describe or (2) act out the microaggression.
Then address possible interpretations, possible intent, and possible implications and impact of the microaggression. Additionally address how does this specific microaggression relate to parts of your own intersectionality/basic social groups and subtypes that you make up. Furthermore, you can address psychological consequences related to this microaggression, themes associated with this microaggression, and how other sources (e.g., the media) further promotes themes associated with the microaggression.
Additionally, you may add text, transitions, or effects to your video.
In addition to the TikTok video, an outline of the information gathered on the topic along with at minimum three references from trusted sources (e.g., peer reviewed journals) are to be submitted on Blackboard prior to presenting your video to the class.
Writing :On pg 7 of The Elements of Teaching Writing, the authors argue that what constitutes good writing differs across different discourse communities. Based on your experience, describe briefly (in 150 words approx.) what constitutes good writing in psychology? While responding, you might want to consider genres apart from academic papers, such as blog posts, newspaper articles, podcasts as well. Post your responses as comments on this post
Designing: Design /revise an existing assignment or class project from your syllabus to incorporate the use of social media. Please create a separate blog post for your assignment, and select the category “Spring 2023” before publishing.
Reading: Chp 2 of Gottschalk & Hjortshoj. During our next workshop we will be reviewing our assignments using the criteria listed on pages 29-40 .
Welcome to module three. In this section, we will be discussing about How do we make meaning of this large corpus of tweets? What are systematic approaches to data analysis ?
Overview of module:
1. Brief introduction to approaches for data analysis
2. Sampling
1. Brief Introduction to Approaches for Data Analysis
Approaches to analyze tweets, and other social media data are multifarious and vast. Describing them in detail is beyond the scope of this resource. The slide show below provides a quick snapshot of different approaches for analyzing tweets. There are additional resources provided, in case you are interested to learn more.
A random sample is when all observations/respondents in a population have an equal chance of being selected. For eg picking a number for bingo. For our project, an easy way to do this is to use a random number generator and select corresponding tweets from the TAGS archive.
A purposive sample is when you select a sample of tweets, based on certain criteria. This criteria will depend on your topic of interest or your research question. For example, you might decide to select tweets of those residing in a certain region or in tweets by users of mental health services. In the former case, you can easily shortlist regions of interest by selecting relevant categories under “user_location” (Column P).
How to select regions of interest using the Google Sheets drop down menu
Note: If the number of tweets in your purposive sample is high , you might want to use a random number generator to select tweets from within the category
“The classroom remains the most radical space of possibility in the academy”
― bell hooks
The above quote by bell hooks from her book “Teaching to transgress” exalts us to expand our vision of the classroom. hooks provokes us to move beyond passive instructional pedagogy and imagine learning communities that are collaborative, and nurture dialogue and critical thinking.
Reframing this in the context of the current project, the classroom offers radical possibilities of collaborating with “digital natives” (Prensky, 2011) to uncover the socio-historical context of existing digital landscapes and unpack how power is perpetuated, exacerbated, and mitigated by information systems. It also offers us unique possibilities of crafting digital futures that cultivate meaningful relationships, and fostering social change.
Technical systems, akin to social and legal codes, are entrenched in the inequalities of power plaguing our societies. Within popular discourse, replacing human judgment with AI based decision making is wrongly considered a viable solution to address issues of biases in institutions such as the criminal justice system. These assumptions stem from beliefs about Big Data as being “unbiased”, “objective”, and “theory- free”. Wrong assumptions about the implicit neutrality of digital architecture are harmful as they can lead to overconfidence in exactitude, underestimation of risks, and minimization of epistemological issues
In her seminal book “Race after Technology: Abolitionist tools for a New Jim Code”, Ruha Benjamin (2019) argues that racism and other forms of discrimination are embedded in digital architectures. Across diverse sectors such as health care, criminal justice, and finance, researchers have demonstrated how “unbiased” algorithms systematically discriminate against people of color. Obermeyer (2019) and his colleagues demonstrated how a widely used algorithm in healthcare was more likely to flag white patients for extra medical attention than blacks who were just as sick.
Algorithms not only betray the biased assumptions of individuals and institutions who create them but also of society as a whole. All AI based decision making tools need to be “trained” based on existing datasets. By default, their results will continue to perpetuate the discrepancies in the original datasets themselves.
There is a need to critically examine the technical choices underlying digital infrastructure. These choices determine the nature, purpose, and outcome of digital applications. They also offer important clues to how structural problems in society extend to digital contexts.
Risks and affordances enabled by the rise of social media
Digital technologies act as neural pathways supporting mobilizing efforts both online and offline. On one hand this has enabled mass mobilization across the globe around issues of racism and gender discrimination. The Black Lives Matters movement is a case in point. Social media enabled the mobilization of mass protests against racial violence across the US and the globe. According to some estimates, the murder of George Floyd witnessed the highest number of anti racist protests in the history of the US (Buchanan et. al, 2020).
Social media platforms, unfortunately, have also created opportunities for mobilization around extremist ideologies and a re-emergence for the alt- right across the globe. According to Jessie Daniels (2018), “The rise of the alt-right is both a continuation of a centuries-old dimension of racism in the U.S. and part of an emerging media ecosystem powered by algorithms”. The alt- right have been early adopters of social media and is heavily invested in community building online and recruiting White working class youth into its fold. When such users were banned from mainstream social media sites for spreading false information and violent content, they created their own parallel digital forums such as Gab. By exploiting the affordability of emerging technologies , the alt- right has been able to expand the boundaries of the acceptable ideas in public discourse, also termed as the “Overton window”. Discussing the implications of these shifts, and the resultant rise in intolerance and hate, dehumanization of the other, and our own vulnerable to false information are important social justice issues of our times.
By their ability to customize content visible to us on the internet, algorithms have the ability to create echo chambers and reinforce our existing beliefs. This results in increased polarization of views and aids in the spread of misinformation. It also masks the covert operations of machineries that spread intolerance and hate. Most people are unaware that platforms like GAB with over 1.1 million followers exist.
As educators it is paramount that we provide our students with the necessary intellectual and digital tools to dissect and confront these unjust technological infrastructures. In the words of Paulo Freire (1972), “There is no such thing as neutral education. Education either functions as an instrument to bring about conformity or freedom.”
The rapid expansion of technology and the accompanying rise in social media users has led to a heightened awareness about the risks and potential harms associated with social media usage. Creating a safe forum for students to discuss and share their ideas is crucial to promote learning in a classroom. These concerns become amplified when digital projects require public-facing engagement by students such as posting, sharing, or reacting to content on social media. In the section below I summarize some of these ethical quandries related to privacy, impact of social media use on mental health, and questions of equity.
Privacy
As more of our everyday lives move online, companies, governments and even the class bully are able to keep a closer watch on the way we think, feel, or behave. The data trails we leave online through our activities raises serious concerns related to privacy. The ways in which data mined by powerful social media platforms makes us vulnerable to manipulation was evident in the The Facebook Cambridge Analytica controversy. As educators, thinking through privacy concerns, especially accounting for how they may impact vulnerable and marginalized students in our class is important.
Dr. Cottom suggests having a separate alias class account, different from student’s “real” or personal account, is a very deliberate strategy while using a social media project in class. Content posted on social media accounts tends to be permanent and gets curated as an artifact of our larger digital persona. Not all students would want their coursework to be in the public eye and part of their online presence. It is common practice for people to “look up” a person on social media- whether it is someone you want to date or a potential employer. Students may not wish to be associated with content they post as an undergraduate student project. The (relatively) permanent nature of the content adds further complication over time. Students personal and professional identities may shift and they may not associate with content they have created.
An additional and potentially more grave concern is around online trolling and doxxing. Words like “racism” or “white supremacy” or discussions on trending issues might expose them to harmful trolling and doxxing. Having a separate social media account for class acts as a form of buffer against online trolling.
Reviewing and controlling the privacy settings is another potential safeguard against trolling. For instance, Twitter allows you to set your account to “protected” so only those who follow you or are tagged in your post can access your tweets.
Removing any personally identifiable information (including images) before posting online is another helpful strategy. This also applies to users whose content we are using in our class projects as well (for eg tweets in the TAGS project). As an additional reference, you can read more about the ethical guidelines developed by the Safelab for working with social media data.
Cyberbullying
A related concern to doxxing is that of cyberbullying. Cyberbullying is the intent to consistently harass another individual to cause harm via any electronic method, including social media, and includes defamation, public disclosure of private facts, and intentional emotional distress. Researchers have enlisted 7 forms of cyberbullying including flaming, online harassment, cyberstalking, denigration, masquerading, trickery and outing, and exclusion (Watts et al., 2017)
Video: What is cyberbullying?
Researchers estimate that between 5 to 40% of undergraduate students have been victims of some form of cyberbullying. This is a serious concern as it could potentially exacerbate mental health concerns within this population (Martinez-Monteagudoet al., 2020)
The data cited above clearly indicates that this is a much more pervasive problem and not necessarily associated with introducing social media projects in class. As educators it is important to be aware of these realities and also be cognizant about how having a social media project could create additional opportunities for bullying. For example, a student may try to stalk a fellow classmate via their class social media handle.
Collectively framing guidelines for respectful digital behavior on social media and discussing case studies of cyber bullying can be a starting point to address these issues.
Surveillance and challenges for vulnerable populations
Considerations around privacy and safety become paramount while working with students belonging to vulnerable and/or marginalized communities. Social media provides a ” broad and deep tool for surveillance ” to law enforcement agencies. During the George Floyd Protests across the US in 2020 or the pro-democracy protests in Hongkong earlier, governments used social media posts to identify and arrest protestors. Information available on social media is used as evidence to incarcerate young people, without adequate consideration of youth digital cultures and norms of exaggeration related to online self presentation. Black and Latino youth in particular face police surveillance and violence that extends from their neighborhoods to social media (Lane and Ramirez, 2021) . Immigrant and undocumented folks are similarly at-risk for surveillance by the Department of Homeland Surveillance. The department has been notoriously infamous for conducting raids using social media activity or even denying Visa applications if social media posts have been critical of the US government.
Listening to concerns of students and identifying those who may be especially vulnerable maybe a first step to address these concerns. There are also some great resources on online safety created by CryptoHarlem, a nonprofit that works to promote AntiSurveillance, Cybersecurity Education & Advocacy.
Social Media Use: Impact on mental health
Many studies are now suggesting that social media usage is correlated with a series of mental health concerns including depression, anxiety, suicidality, body image concerns among others (Kross et. al, 2021). While there it is difficult to establish a direct connection between the two, there are mediating factors such as exposure to cyberbullying, increased social comparison, and reduction in physical activity that occur as a result of high social media usage and exacerbate mental health concerns (Viner et al., 2019). We know for example that increased screen time while going to bed impacts quality and duration of sleep, which in turn impacts mental health.
When initiating a social media based project in the classroom, it might be helpful to have a conversation with students about self care and boundaries around social media. This will also provide students an opportunity to reflect upon their own social media usage and its impact on their wellbeing. Another possibility to take into consideration is that some students may be on a digital detox (El- Khoury et al., 2020) for mental health concerns, and do not wish to be present on a social media platform. In such a scenario, you may want to clarify the requirements on the course at the beginning of the semester and guide students to select alternate courses that might work better for their current situation. You may also consider creating alternate assignments that do not require the use of social media such as a review of literature etc.
Addressing Inequities in Access
In 2021, one in four adults with lower incomes do not have access to home broadband services (43%) and or a desktop or laptop computer (41%).
Pew Research Center, 2021
The CoVID-19 pandemic has directed our attention to ethical concerns around inequities in digital access. As everyday activities moved online, lower income families found it increasingly difficult to navigate these digital demands. Family members were forced to share whatever limited digital resources they had including a broadband connection and devices such as laptops, tablets, and desktops. Researchers have used the term “homework gap” to describe the barriers students face when working on assignments without a reliable Internet source at home. In 2021, one in four adults with lower incomes do not have access to home broadband services (43%) and or a desktop or laptop computer (41%) (Pew Research Center, 2021). Recognizing this gap, schools and universities used government funds to loan devices and provide low cost internet during the pandemic.
For instructors serving low income communities, the lack of access to a personal digital device and good internet connection can pose serious limitations to implementing digital projects. In many educational institutions there is a dearth of devices, and computer labs need to be booked months in advance. Digital divides persisted before the pandemic, and would likely continue into the near future. To what extent institutional supports to counter digital divides will be accessible to students moving forward remains unclear. some studies estimate that 75% of solutions implemented during the pandemic to bridge the homework gap are expected to expire in the next one to three years (Rideout & Robb, 2021) . An important pedagogical consideration, therefore, is to design digital projects keeping in mind these challenges.
Lack of access to a personal digital device (other than a smartphone) was an important factor incorporated in the design of the resources outlined on this website. Both TAGS and Google sheets are applications that are stored on the google drive cloud. You do not need to install them on a specific computer. The archive of tweets you gather via TAGS is saved on your google drive and you can access it anywhere- a friends device or a public computer.
Digital divides also have important implications for designing lesson plans. Student’s technical skills are closely linked with their previous exposure to digital contexts. For example, projects described on this website require the use of google sheets or Microsoft Excel. The first time I implemented this project, I wrongly assumed students would be familiar with these platforms. After noticing some students puzzled by the project instructions, I realized they had not used these software before. Acknowledging this error, I held a separate workshop to teach basic spreadsheet skills for the class. Surprisingly, a significant majority of the class participated. Moving forward, I send out a brief survey at the beginning of the semester asking students about their knowledge of various software, but also to understand their current access to internet and digital devices. A survey can help us identify current capabilities of students and plan for supports they need. This also holds true for students who may have advanced technical skills and need more complex assignments to sustain their interest in class. Mapping the capabilities of students and adapting your lesson plans accordingly is a critical aspect of designing learning projects in the classroom.
The financial costs associated with a digital project are another crucial aspect to consider while thinking about access and equity. Many lab based courses offered to undergraduates require the use of paid proprietary software such as STATA, SPSS, SAS, Atlas. These software require paid subscription upwards of 100$ annually, and may discourage students with strained finances to enrolling for the course. As discussed in the Introduction, this website uses Open Educational Resources (OER) applications. OER are freely accessible teaching or research resources that have an open-copyright license (such as one from Creative Commons), or they are part of the public domain and have no copyright. OER materials not only help to reduce costs but also allow students to collaborate and contribute to a growing universe of shared knowledge resources (Wikipedia is a great example).
Martínez-Monteagudo, M. C., Delgado, B., García-Fernández, J. M., & Ruíz-Esteban, C. (2020). Cyberbullying in the university setting. Relationship with emotional problems and adaptation to the university. Frontiers in psychology, 3074.
Viner, R. M., Gireesh, A., Stiglic, N., Hudson, L. D., Goddings, A. L., Ward, J. L., & Nicholls, D. E. (2019). Roles of cyberbullying, sleep, and physical activity in mediating the effects of social media use on mental health and wellbeing among young people in England: a secondary analysis of longitudinal data. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 3(10), 685-696.
Watts, L. K., Wagner, J., Velasquez, B., & Behrens, P. I. (2017). Cyberbullying in higher education: A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 268-274.
Need help with the Commons?
Email us at commonshelpsite@gmail.com so we can respond to your questions and requests. Please email from your CUNY email address if possible. Or visit our help site for more information:
